| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. Mini-gastric Bypass for Obesity In the most recent issue of Annals of Surgery researchers show that laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass is a simpler and safer procedure that has no disadvantage compared with laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Researchers conducted a prospective, randomized trial to
compare treatments of morbid obesity. The team compared the safety and
effectiveness of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic
mini-gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity. The researchers found one conversion in the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass group. Operation time was shorter in laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass group and there was no mortality in either group. The team observed that the operative morbidity rate was higher in the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass group, at 20 percent versus 8 percent. The late complications rate was the same in the two groups at 8 percent with no re-operation. The team noted that weight loss was 59 percent and 60 percent at one and two years, respectively, in the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass group. The team noted that percentage weight loss in the group was 65 percent and 64 percent in the laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass group. Residual excess weight of less than 50 percent at two years postoperatively was achieved in 75 percent of patients in the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass group. In comparison, the researchers found that residual excess weight loss at two years in the laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass group was 95 percent. A significant improvement of obesity-related clinical parameters and complete resolution of metabolic syndrome in both groups were noted. In addition, the researchers observed that gastrointestinal quality of life increased significantly without any significant difference between the groups. Annals of Surgery; 2005: 242(1): 20-8 |
|
Disclaimer Notice:-Information on this web
site is provided for informational purposes only. |